![]() ![]() These characters materialize out of nowhere, fall instantly in love with Marco, and say inexplicable things. It involves the character of the woman named Rose or Rosie, who Marco meets on a train she was played in 1962 by Janet Leigh and this time by Kimberly Elise. Times column "The Arabian Candidate.")Įvery time I watch the original "Manchurian Candidate," I'm teased by the possibility that there may be another, deeper, level of conspiracy, one we're intended to sense without quite understanding. (For truly uninhibited parallelism in interpreting the movie, read Paul Krugman's July 20 N.Y. Demme sticks his knife in everywhere, suggesting that the whole system and both parties have been compromised by the power of corporations. It's necessary for the national healing."įrank Rich writes in the New York Times that the movie is "more partisan" than " Fahrenheit 9/11," but that requires a simpler and more translatable plot than the one I saw. Demme's movie has all sorts of characters on the screen who tempt us to name their real-life counterparts, but he doesn't do simplistic one-to-one parallels instead, he allows sly contemporary references to enter the film through many characters, as when one candidate calls for "compassionate vigilance." Another bold line, by Mrs. Hillary Clinton, but I dunno Streep has mentioned Peggy Noonan, Condi Rice and Dick Cheney. Gossips have whispered for months that her performance is modeled on Sen. ![]() Streep wisely goes for oblique humor rather than straight-ahead villainy, making the character different and yet just as loathsome. Shaw, a role for which Angela Lansbury won an Oscar nomination, while essentially stealing the movie. Meryl Streep has the assignment of playing the alarming and incestuous Mrs. Schreiber, as Shaw, has the role played by Laurence Harvey in the original, and Washington follows Frank Sinatra. The Secret Service then comes to the rescue, but Shaw declines to press charges, leaving us to wonder how the news organizations cover the remarkable spectacle of a decorated veteran biting a heroic candidate. At one point, Marco actually leaps upon the vice presidential candidate, rips off his shirt and tries to bite a chip out from under his skin. After he discovers a chip under the skin of his shoulder, he desperately tries to get to Shaw to talk about their experience. Washington plays Marco as a man with the public face of a decorated officer and the private tortures of a haunted man. Instead, Demme wisely conceals other secrets, leading to a wickedly different ending just when you think you know everything that will happen. "I remember that it happened," Shaw confesses to Marco, "but I don't remember it happening."Īudiences of the earlier film will know that during the patrol's missing days, as Marco eventually concludes, "Somebody got into our minds with chainsaws." The brainwashing is front-loaded in Demme's version it's revealed fairly early, perhaps because he and his writers concluded there was no use being coy about a secret that most of the audience already knows. Marco notes that all the patrol members use identical words to describe their experience. But did Shaw really save them? Marco and Melvin have fragmented nightmares of an alternate reality. Shaw - whose Medal of Honor launched his political career. Ben Marco ( Denzel Washington) and Al Melvin ( Jeffrey Wright) both fought in the Gulf War, as members of a patrol that was saved by the heroism of Sgt. This plan is on track and will succeed, unless two men can make sense of their nightmares. Raymond has a chip implanted in his skull which will allow Manchurian to control him. A stage mother from hell, she pushes her son Raymond ( Liev Schreiber) into the vice presidency a timely assassination will make him president. Eleanor Shaw, who has sold her soul to the Manchurian Global Corp. In the new version, right-wingers pose as liberals to win office while neutering the left. Demme is not shy about suggesting parallels with current politics, and he borrows a neat bit of indirection from Frankenheimer: In the 1962 version, communists posed as anti-communists to drum up hysteria that could be used to subvert American freedoms. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |